In this tutorial, we’ll be covering Binary Trees, Binary Search Trees, and K-ary Trees. We will review some common terminology that is shared amongst all of the trees and then dive into specifics of the different types.
k = 2
.An important aspect of trees is how to traverse them. Traversing a tree allows us to search for a node, print out the contents of a tree, and much more! There are two categories of traversals when it comes to trees:
Depth first traversal is where we prioritize going through the depth (height) of the tree first. There are multiple ways to carry out depth first traversal, and each method changes the order in which we search/print the root
. Here are three methods for depth first traversal:
root >> left >> right
left >> root >> right
left >> right >> root
Given the sample tree above, our traversals would result in different paths:
A, B, D, E, C, F
D, B, E, A, F, C
D, E, B, F, C, A
The most common way to traverse through a tree is to use recursion. With these traversals, we rely on the call stack to navigate back up the tree when we have reached the end of a sub-path.
Let’s break down the pre-order traversal. Here is the pseudocode for this traversal method:
ALGORITHM preOrder(root)
OUTPUT <-- root.value
if root.left is not NULL
preOrder(root.left)
if root.right is not NULL
preOrder(root.right)
Pre-order means that the root
has to be looked at first. In our case, looking at the root just means that we output its value. When we call preOrder
for the first time, the root
will be added to the call stack:
Next, we start reading our preOrder
function’s code from top to bottom. The first line of code reads this:
OUTPUT <-- root.value
This means that we will output the root.value
out to the console. Then, our next block of code instructs us to check if our root
has a left
node set. If the root does, we will then send the left
node to our preOrder
method recursively. This means that we make another function call, where B
is our new root
:
This process continues until we reach a leaf node. Here’s the state of our tree when we hit our first leaf, D
:
It’s important to note a few things that are about to happen:
root.left
and a root.right
. Both will return null
, so it will end the execution of that method callD
will pop off of the call stack and the root
will be reassigned back to B
The code block will now pick up where it left off when B
was the root. Since it already looked for root.left
, it will now look for root.right
.
E
will output to the console. Since E
is a leaf, it will complete the method code block, and pop E
off of the call stack and make its way back up to B
.
In the function call, B
has already checked for root.left
, and root.right
. There are no further lines of code to execute, so B
will be popped off the call stack, so that we can resume execution of A
.
Following the same pattern as we did with the other nodes, A
’s call stack frame will pick up where it left off, and check out root.right
. C
will be added to the call stack frame, and it will become the new function’s root
.
C
will be outputted to the console, and root.left
will be evaluated. Because C
has a left child, preOrder
will be called, with the parameter root.left
.
At this point, the program will find that F
does not have any children and it will make its way back up the call stack up to C
.
C
does not have a root.right
, so it will pop off the call stack and return to A
.
Congratulations! Your pre-order traversal is completed!
Here is the pseudocode for all three of the depth first traversals:
ALGORITHM preOrder(root)
// INPUT <-- root node
// OUTPUT <-- pre-order output of tree node's values
OUTPUT <-- root.value
if root.left is not Null
preOrder(root.left)
if root.right is not NULL
preOrder(root.right)
ALGORITHM inOrder(root)
// INPUT <-- root node
// OUTPUT <-- in-order output of tree node's values
if root.left is not NULL
inOrder(root.left)
OUTPUT <-- root.value
if root.right is not NULL
inOrder(root.right)
ALGORITHM postOrder(root)
// INPUT <-- root node
// OUTPUT <-- post-order output of tree node's values
if root.left is not NULL
postOrder(root.left)
if root.right is not NULL
postOrder(root.right)
OUTPUT <-- root.value
Notice the similarities between the three different traversals above. The biggest difference between each of the traversals is when you are looking at the root node.
Breadth first traversal iterates through the tree by going through each level of the tree node-by-node. So, given our starting tree one more time:
Our output using breadth first traversal is now:
Output: A, B, C, D, E, F
Traditionally, breadth first traversal uses a queue (instead of the call stack via recursion) to traverse the width/breadth of the tree. Let’s break down the process.
Given our starting tree shown above, let’s start by putting the root
into the queue:
Now that we have one node in our queue, we can dequeue
it and use that node in our code.
From our dequeued node A
, we can enqueue
the left
and right
child (in that order).
This leaves us with B
as the new front of our queue. We can then repeat the process we did with A
: Dequeue the front node, enqueue that node’s left
and right
nodes, and move to the next new front of the queue.
Now our front is C
, so we repeat the dequeue + enqueue children process:
And we continue onwards. When we reach a node that doesn’t have any children, we just dequeue it without any further enqueue.
Here is the pseudocode, utilizing a built-in queue to implement a breadth first traversal.
ALGORITHM breadthFirst(root)
// INPUT <-- root node
// OUTPUT <-- front node of queue to console
Queue breadth <-- new Queue()
breadth.enqueue(root)
while ! breadth.is_empty()
node front = breadth.dequeue()
OUTPUT <-- front.value
if front.left is not NULL
breadth.enqueue(front.left)
if front.right is not NULL
breadth.enqueue(front.right)
In all of our examples, we’ve been using a Binary Tree. Trees can have any number of children per node, but Binary Trees restrict the number of children to two (hence our left
and right
children).
There is no specific sorting order for a binary tree. Nodes can be added into a binary tree wherever space allows. Here is what a binary tree looks like:
If Nodes are able have more than 2 child nodes, we call the tree that contains them a K-ary Tree. In this type of tree we use K
to refer to the maximum number of children that each Node is able to have.
Traversing a K-ary tree requires a similar approach to the breadth first traversal. We are still pushing nodes into a queue, but we are now moving down a list of children of length k, instead of checking for the presence of a left and a right child.
If we traversed this tree Breadth First we should see the output:
Output: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H
We will still start at the root
Node, and we will add it to our queue
:
Much like before, as long as we have a node in our queue
we can dequeue
:
With every Node we dequeue
, we check its list of childre and enqueue
each one:
Once these are queued up, can move on to Node B
at the front of the queue
, which we can dequeue
followed by enqueing
Node B
’s children:
This process of dequeuing
and processing the Nodes at the front of the queue
, followed by enqueing
the current Node’s children continues until our queue
is empty of child Nodes:
This process is very similar to our binary tree traversal, but now we check a list of children instead of a left and right child properties. It should look something like this:
ALGORITHM breadthFirst(root)
// INPUT <-- root node
// OUTPUT <-- front node of queue to console
Queue breadth <-- new Queue()
breadth.enqueue(root)
while ! breadth.is_empty()
node front = breadth.dequeue()
OUTPUT <-- front.value
for child in front.children
breadth.enqueue(child)
Because there are no structural rules for where nodes are “supposed to go” in a binary tree, it really doesn’t matter where a new node gets placed.
One strategy for adding a new node to a binary tree is to fill all “child” spots from the top down. To do so, we would leverage the use of breadth first traversal. During the traversal, we find the first node that does not have all its children filled, and insert the new node as a child. We fill the child slots from left to right.
In the event you would like to have a node placed in a specific location, you need to reference both the new node to create, and the parent node which the child is attached to.
The Big O time complexity for inserting a new node is O(n)
. Searching for a specific node will also be O(n)
. Because of the lack of organizational structure in a Binary Tree, the worst case for most operations will involve traversing the entire tree. If we assume that a tree has n
nodes, then in the worst case we will have to look at n
items, hence the O(n)
complexity.
The Big O space complexity for a node insertion using breadth first insertion will be O(w)
, where w
is the largest width of the tree. For example, in the above tree, w
is 4.
A “perfect” binary tree is one where every non-leaf node has exactly two children. The maximum width for a perfect binary tree, is 2^(h-1)
, where h
is the height of the tree. Height can be calculated as log n
, where n
is the number of nodes.
A Binary Search Tree (BST) is a type of tree that does have some structure attached to it. In a BST, nodes are organized in a manner where all values that are smaller than the root
are placed to the left, and all values that are larger than the root
are placed to the right.
Here is how we would change our Binary Tree example into a Binary Search Tree:
Searching a BST can be done quickly, because all you do is compare the node you are searching for against the root of the tree or sub-tree. If the value is smaller, you only traverse the left side. If the value is larger, you only traverse the right side.
Let’s say we are searching 15
. We start by comparing the value 15
to the value of the root, 23
.
15 < 23
, so we traverse the left side of the tree. We then treat 8
as our new “root” to compare against.
15 > 8
, so we traverse the right side. 16
is our new root.
15 < 16
, so we traverse the left side. And aha! 15
is our new root and also a match with what we were searching for.
The best way to approach a BST search is with a while
loop. We cycle through the while loop until we hit a leaf, or until we reach a match with what we’re searching for.
The Big O time complexity of a Binary Search Tree’s insertion and search operations is O(h)
, or O(height)
. In the worst case, we will have to search all the way down to a leaf, which will require searching through as many nodes as the tree is tall. In a balanced (or “perfect”) tree, the height of the tree is log(n)
. In an unbalanced tree, the worst case height of the tree is n
.
The Big O space complexity of a BST search would be O(1)
. During a search, we are not allocating any additional space.